Topics: Approaches to nonduality and awakening including- mindfulness approaches, early Buddhism, awareness teachings, self-inquiry, Advaita Vedanta, Emotional integration, Dzogchen, jnana yoga, bhakti yoga, Gurdjieff work, release work, Sedona Method, ACIM, forgiveness work, Ho'oponopono, somatic therapies, meditation approaches, breathwork, and more. (Sydney AU)
Monday, August 4, 2014
Meditating with eyes fully shut or half shut?
I've recently been experimenting with meditating and performing internal exercises with eyes half-shut, instead of eyes fully shut.
Some meditation teachers emphasize that eyes should be fully shut while meditating to reduce all distraction and retain full attention internally. Others emphasise half-shut eyes, in order to maintain added alertness, and also to avoid going into a 'void' state.
IME, after practicing for years with eyes fully shut, I have come to appreciate the half-shut position more, and now only use this while meditating or performing internal looking.
The reason for this is that IME I found that it not only helped with the above (added alertness, stopping 'void' drifting etc.), but also that it helped with posture and alignment of the head/neck.
It seems that the movement of the eyes definitely affects the position of the head/neck, even slightly or very subtly.
This has been noted in various therapies/systems, such as the Alexander Technique- 'the head follows the eyes, and the spine follows the head' etc. (paraphrasing here).
What seems to be a small point, and is usually brushed off as trivial by most meditation teachers, is actually quite a large point and can have a definite impact on a practice.
Experiment with both, and note the differences.
Labels:
alexander technique,
eyes,
head,
meditation,
neck,
void
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment